# REJECTION — SGrok Sales Ops UX Verify R2
# WO-2026-MIUSA-SALES-OPS-001
# Filed: AT 2026-05-14 | Codex for AR

## Verdict

REJECT:

```text
/opt/veritize-docker/ops/queue/agents/sgrok/outbox/2026-05-14_DONE_SGROK_2026-05-14_DISPATCH_SALES-OPS-UX-VERIFY-R2.md
```

## Reason

The report is not AGE-safe. It invented placeholder XML IDs that were not in the prior UX review or SC evidence:

- `CRM-XML-ID-001`
- `CRM-XML-ID-002`
- `SALES-XML-ID-003`
- `SALES-XML-ID-004`

It also claimed an example `SALES-XML-ID-004` was active/usable, but SC evidence says:

```text
CRM models: 0
Sales models: 0
CRM/Sales view XML IDs: 0
```

Source:

```text
/opt/veritize-docker/ops/queue/approval/2026-05-14_SC_DONE_SALES-OPS-ERP-PROBE.md
```

## Corrective Action

R3 must classify only exact prior referenced items inline. No placeholder IDs. No invented active view. If a module/view/model is absent, say `NOT CURRENTLY PRESENT`.

TRUTH MATTERS(R) · OTC: USDW · CAGE 8JSY1